When something we published turns out to be wrong or stated too broadly, we fix it on the page and record the fix here, with the date, the old claim and the new one. Nothing gets corrected silently.
Changes to the exam's scoring rules are a different kind of change and live on how the exam works. To report an error, use the corrections line.
We said: We said we never went looking for a way around a closed door, and that we record a closed door rather than looking for a window.
We now say: We say what holds: we never obtain or use credentials, checking whether a door is closed from inside our own account is part of the work, and a closed door is recorded as a finding and not broken open.
Our own notes record checks made from inside our account. The old sentence claimed more restraint than the record supports, so it was the sentence that had to change.
We said: Pine phones companies on your behalf and Muse does not.
We now say: Meta's own guidance inside Muse says business calling is in early access and reaching accounts gradually. The account we examined never received it, so we have not seen a Muse call happen.
Guidance that ships inside the product, collected after the comparison was written, describes the calling feature and its limits.
We said: Living in a message thread costs Instinct the confirmation step the other products rely on.
We now say: A message thread costs it an editable plan. It keeps a confirmation step: an approval card with approve, deny or dismiss, bound to the exact text it showed you.
Our own scorecard already described the approval card. The two pages contradicted it.
We said: Town's template runs to 24 sections, and Town has 33 specialised assistants, each with its own instructions.
We now say: The main template we collected has 11 sections, and 24 is only what a fuller version is said to run to. Of 33 assistant records, 29 carry their own instructions and 4 are shells whose work is done in code we never saw.
Our teardown notes were revised after the pages were written. We had printed the claimed figure as if we had seen it.